TABLE OF CONTENTS

WHAT ARE GROUNDS FOR SUPPRESSION OF TANGIBLE EVIDENCE? 1
WHAT MUST MOTION CONTAIN? 1
WHAT PROCEDURAL CONSIDERATIONS APPLY? 1
  • General rules 1
  • Is exclusion the appropriate remedy? 2
  • Credibility 5
  • Majority U.S. Supreme Court opinions 7
  • Delays in filing or in hearing 7
  • Power to reconsider 7
  • Preparation of orders 8
  • What are the steps at the hearing? 8
  • Standard of review 8
WHAT MUST THE DEFENDANT SHOW BEFORE THE STATE HAS TO PRESENT EVIDENCE? 13
  • That a validly executed warrant was required and there wasn't one 13
  • A search and\or seizure of the person or property 14
  • Specific instances 15
  • Was the contact a consensual encounter, rather than a detention? 28
  • Other examples of consensual encounters 36
  • Government action or private action with government involvement 41
  • A reasonable expectation of privacy or what is often referred to as standing 43
  • General principles 43
  • Students 44
  • Test 46
  • Raising rights of codefendants 46
  • A reasonable expectation of privacy 47
  • No reasonable expectation of privacy 52
  • Definition 29
  • Restrictions on officer's conduct 30
  • Factors to consider 30
IF THE DEFENDANT MEETS HIS OR HER BURDEN, WHAT MUST
THE STATE SHOW? 58
IN CONSIDERING THE MOTION, THE FIRST QUESTION SHOULD BE WHETHER THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE WAS PURSUANT TO A VALID WARRANT? 58
  • Was the affidavit valid? 58
  • Standard of review on motion to suppress 58
  • Rules concerning information provided by informant 60
  • Rules for dealing with omissions, misrepresentations, or defective information 65
  • Other rules 66
  • Staleness 68
  • Examples 69
  • Were there any significant defects in the warrant? 70
  • Examples of problems with warrant 70
  • Scrivener's error 75
  • Staleness 75
  • Was the warrant properly executed? 76
  • General rules 76
  • Did the knock and announce law (§933.O9) apply? 78
  • When is forcible unannounced entry proper? 78
  • Small amount of drugs in dwelling 81
  • Persons and property on the premises 82
  • Scope of search 87
  • Curtilage 88
IF THERE WAS A SEARCH AND SEIZURE WITHOUT A WARRANT,
HAS THE STATE PROVEN THAT IT WAS REASONABLE? 89
  • Did the search involve a probationer? 89
  • Was it the result of a lawful temporary detention? 92
  • These factors should be considered 95
  • Cases dealing with some specific scenarios 96
  • Presence in high crime area or drug activity 96
  • F!eeing or evasive action 111
  • Tips 112
  • Use of a vehicle 139
  • Other observations of noncriminal activity 143
  • Furtive movement 151
  • Use of a profile 152
  • Other factors 153
  • If there was reasonable suspicion what are the rules concerning the search or securing of information? 161
  • Grounds and rules for pat down and search 161
  • Discovery of unthreatening object 168
  • Type of crime 171
  • Information provided by an informant 173
  • Specific examples 173
  • Was the extent of detention proper? 177
  • Was the search incidental to a lawful arrest? 179
  • Definition of an arrest 179
  • Probable cause or a valid warrant 180
  • There must be lawful authority 20
  • Misdemeanors, ordinances, and traffic offenses 207
  • Search may precede arrest as long as there is probable cause 215
  • Arrest may be on different charge than one later filed 215
  • Officer’s mistake as to basis for search 216
  • Must be incidental to the arrest and not remote 216
  • What is the proper scope of such a search? 217
  • Incidental to arrest in home 217
  • Was the search pursuant to voluntary consent? 220
  • Burden of proof where there is no unlawful police activity in initial stop:
    preponderance of the evidence 221
  • Burden of proof where unlawful police activity precedes the alleged consent 222
  • Advising the defendant of the right to refuse consent 222
  • Did the person have authority to consent? 225
  • General rules applying to joint occupants 225
  • Consent by minors 232
  • Types of relationships 233
  • Was the consent voluntary 236
  • Was the search within the scope of the consent? 24
  • Abandonment 247
  • Voluntary abandonment 247
  • Dropping item before being captured or submitting to unlawful detention 249
  • Dropping item after unlawful stop or order 252
  • Dropping item after lawful stop or order 256
  • Exigent circumstances 256
  • Destruction of evidence 258
  • Emergency or dangerous situation 260
  • End of exigency 264
  • Plain view 265
  • Were observations lawfully made from a place where the officer had a lawful right to be? 267
  • The officers are in a place where they have a right to be 268
  • Did the officer have reasonable cause to believe the object was
    contraband or evidence merely by observing it without a further search? 268
  • Did the officer have a lawful right of access to the object without a warrant? 276
DID THE SEARCH OR DETENTION INVOLVE A STUDENT ON SCHOOL PROPERTY OR
INVOLVED IN SCHOOL ACTIVITY? 277
DID THE SEARCH INVOLVE AN INTRUSION INTO A HOME? 280
  • Special nature of the home 280
  • Felony 281
  • Misdemeanors 283
  • Observations from adjoining property286
IF THERE WAS A SEARCH AND SEIZURE WITHOUT A WARRANT, DID IT
INVOLVE A MOTOR VEHICLE? 286
  • Limited expectation of privacy 286
  • When is the warrantless search of an automobile proper? 287
  • Stops for non traffic related conduct 289
  • Stops for traffic violations or unusual driving behavior 289
  • Authority to arrest in motor vehicle cases 304
  • Citizen's arrest 312
  • Scope of search 314
  • Forced exit of occupants 322
  • Pretextual stop 323
  • Development and changes in legal standards 323
  • Examples post Whren 327
  • Examples pre-Kehoe 330
  • Examples pre-Whren & post-Kehoe 330
  • Inventory of the vehicle 336
  • Duration and nature of the detention 339
  • Roadblock 343
  • Detention status 343
  • Constitutional concerns 344
  • Standards for the use of roadblocks 346
  • Roadblocks for nontraffic enforcement purposes 350
IF THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE IS NOT JUSTIFIED BY A WARRANT OR ONE OF THE EXCEPTIONS TO THE WARRANT REQUIREMENT AND THE OFFICER IS OUTSIDE OF HIS OR HER JURISDICTION,
CAN IT BE JUSTIFIED AS A CITIZEN'S ARREST? 352
IF THERE WAS NO WARRANT AND THE STATE FAILED TO PROVE UP AN EXCEPTION TO THE WARRANT REQUIREMENT, IS THE EVIDENCE, NEVERTHELESS, ADMISSIBLE BECAUSE OF THE APPLICATION OF SOME EXCEPTION TO THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE? 353
  • Good faith exception 354
  • Deficiency in affidavit for search warrant 354
  • Deficiency in search warrant 357
  • Execution of warrant 358
  • Wiretaps 358
  • Invalid ordinance or statute 358
  • Fellow officer rule 359
  • Miscellaneous applications 366
  • Inevitable discovery doctrine 367
  • Independent source 371
  • Exclusively for inpeachment 372
WHETHER FLORIDA'S PRIVACY AMENDMENT AS SET FORTH IN ARTICLE I, §23 WOULD BAR ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE BECAUSE OF HIGHER STANDARDS THAN SEARCH & SEIZURE
PROVISIONS? 372
  • Standards 372
  • Electronic interceptions 373
  • Effect on other constitutional provisions 374
DISTINCTION FROM MOTION IN LIMINE 375